Centralised finance platforms, usually shortened to CeFi, are companies that hold your crypto and pay you a return on it. Picking one in 2026 comes down to what you want to do, which assets you actually hold, what the advertised rate requires before you can reach it, and how quickly you can get your money back out.
Headline rates are the worst possible way to compare them, and that is most of what comparisons publish. A rate can belong to an asset you do not own, require buying the platform's own token, need a loyalty tier you will not reach, sit behind a waiting period, or arrive with a fee already carved out of it. This page sets out what each platform's number actually requires, using figures read from each company's own pages in September 2026.
Updated 20 September 2026
How this comparison works
Two ground rules, because without them the numbers below would not be comparable at all.
First, the rates compared here are those paid on assets you deposit, meaning Bitcoin, Ethereum and stablecoins. Several platforms, including EarnPark, also run a separate product that pays a much higher rate for staking the platform's own token. Those are not in the comparison, because the return there depends on the price of a volatile token you have to buy first, which is a different proposition from earning on assets you already hold. They are covered separately below.
Second, the rates are gross and advertised, taken from each platform's published pages rather than measured. Where a platform takes a fee out of the rewards, that is noted, but a reader should not treat any two rows as an equal comparison of what lands in your account.
What a CeFi platform is
A CeFi platform takes custody of your assets, meaning it holds the keys that control them, and manages the strategy for you. DeFi is the alternative, where you interact with self executing blockchain programs directly and keep control of your own wallet.
The tradeoff is real in both directions. With CeFi you get convenience, ways to move money between a bank account and crypto, and a company that can be held responsible when something goes wrong. What you give up is control, because your assets sit with someone else. Our explainer on CeFi, DeFi and CeDeFi covers where each model gets its return from.
The sector has changed since the 2022 failures of Celsius, BlockFi and Voyager. Reserve reporting is now common and rate structures are more conditional than they were. That is a change in disclosure practice rather than proof that the remaining platforms are safe, and surviving a crisis is not evidence of good risk management.
The platforms side by side
| Platform | Product type | Rate on deposited assets | What the top rate requires | Getting money out | Fee taken from rewards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EarnPark | Managed strategies | Up to 15% USDT and ETH, up to 10% BTC | Available without holding PARK. Top figures come from its higher risk strategies | Varies by strategy, from immediate to a monthly cycle | None stated, fees charged at withdrawal instead |
| Binance.US | Staking | Up to 22.10% | The top rate belongs to one less widely held token | Not comparably disclosed | 9.95% to 39.95%, and 90% on Soft-Stake |
| YouHodler | Yield account | Up to 20% | A loyalty level, raised through platform activity | Its Yield page states no lock period | Not comparably disclosed |
| OKX | Simple Earn | Up to 18.81% on ATOM, 3.41% USDC, 2.08% ETH, 0.43% BTC | The top rate belongs to Cosmos specifically | Flexible redeemable any time, fixed locked for the term | 15% of returns on flexible, none on fixed |
| Nexo | Earn account | Up to 13% | A loyalty tier set by holding NEXO as a share of your portfolio, plus a 5,000 USD minimum to enter the programme | Not comparably disclosed across tiers | Not comparably disclosed |
| Ledn | Growth Account | 5% to 8.5% on USDC | Stablecoins only, and its own pages differ on the tiers | Not comparably disclosed | Not comparably disclosed |
| Coinbase | Rewards and staking | 3.50% on USDC | A paid membership | Not comparably disclosed | A commission on staking rewards, varying by asset |
"Not comparably disclosed" means the platform publishes something, but not in a form that can be set beside the others honestly. That gap is itself worth noticing when choosing.
Three patterns matter more than any single number in that table.
The fee taken from rewards is the least visible condition of the three. Binance.US publishes a standard service fee of 9.95% to 39.95% deducted from staking rewards, and 90% on its Soft-Stake product. OKX states it takes 15% of accrued returns on flexible Simple Earn and passes on the remaining 85%. Neither is concealed, but a fee charged against the reward is far easier to miss than one charged at withdrawal, and it changes what you actually receive.
The asset the headline belongs to is the second. OKX's 18.81% is Cosmos. On the same page its Bitcoin rate is 0.43% and its Ethereum rate is 2.08%. A headline driven by one mid sized token says very little about the assets most people hold.
The third is that a product can simply stop existing, which is the Ledn case below.
EarnPark
EarnPark holds your assets but runs blockchain based strategies with them rather than only lending them to borrowers, a hybrid its own materials call CeDeFi. Per its page on how it makes money, returns come from market making, liquidity provision, and a small high risk group of leveraged perpetual futures positions.
The published rates are up to 15% on USDT and ETH and up to 10% on BTC as of September 2026, and those base figures do not require holding PARK. The PARK token exists and holding it can add a boost on top, which is a different thing from the advertised number being gated behind it.
What the top of each range does require is accepting the terms of the strategy that produces it. Those top figures come from higher risk strategies that settle on a monthly cycle, so a withdrawal request is processed on a scheduled date rather than on demand. Lower risk options pay less and behave differently. Market making strategies update rewards daily but require a waiting period after you request a withdrawal, and that period is set by the individual strategy rather than platform wide, so the one that matters is the one attached to the product you chose. The DeFi strategies on USDT and USDC process withdrawals without that wait.
Separately, EarnPark runs PARK staking, the native token product this comparison excludes for everyone. Its published rate is far above the asset rates above, it does require buying and holding PARK, and it therefore carries exposure to that token's price on top of the yield. Its terms are published in the staking guide. Requesting an unstake starts a 30 day waiting period, the request can be cancelled during the first day, rewards accrue daily and compound, and during the waiting period they accrue at half the normal rate. The rate itself is dynamic and moves with the size of the staking pool, so the current figure is the one shown in the app rather than any number quoted in an article.
On costs, withdrawals from the wallet are free, withdrawals from a strategy cost a flat fee of around two dollars, and the USDT and USDC DeFi strategies cost roughly three to three dollars twenty plus a 0.3% management fee. The minimum deposit is around fifteen dollars depending on the asset and strategy, per the published fee documentation.
On structure, EarnPark Platform LLP is registered in the UK as a limited liability partnership and the group also operates a BVI entity. That is a company registration rather than a financial licence, and the difference matters more in this sector than in most. Custody runs through Fireblocks, a firm that provides the infrastructure for holding keys and authorising transactions, which addresses how assets are secured rather than whether a strategy makes money. The platform publishes proof of reserves, a statement of assets held at a given date, and holds a CertiK audit covering code within a defined scope. Neither establishes solvency on an ongoing basis.
Head to head breakdowns are available against Nexo, YouHodler and Ledn.
Nexo
Nexo combines earn, borrowing and a card in one account across a wide asset list, and advertises up to 13% with daily compounding.
The condition is the loyalty programme. Per its own support pages, tier is set by what share of your portfolio you hold in NEXO tokens, rising to 10% of the portfolio at the top tier, and entering the programme at all requires a 5,000 USD minimum portfolio balance. That is worth reading carefully, because it means improving your rate involves putting part of your account into NEXO and taking on that token's price risk alongside the yield. Nexo also lists being paid in NEXO, and using fixed term savings, as routes to better rates, so the unqualified headline is best treated as the top of a range whose conditions you should check before relying on it.
Nexo suits someone who wants several products in one place and is willing to hold its token. It suits a holder of Bitcoin or stablecoins only, with no interest in acquiring NEXO, considerably less well.
Ledn
Ledn is the entry most 2026 comparisons still get wrong, including the previous version of this page.
Ledn permanently closed its Bitcoin and Ethereum interest accounts, which it called Growth Accounts. Its own help centre records the final interest payment as 1 July 2025 and states that Growth Accounts are now available only for USDC and USDT. Any comparison presenting Ledn as a place to earn on Bitcoin is describing a product that ended over a year ago.
What Ledn does now is stablecoin yield and Bitcoin backed borrowing. Its own pages are not consistent on the stablecoin rate, with the savings landing page showing 5% below 100,000 USDC and 6% above, while the dedicated USDC page shows 6.5% and 8.5% at the same thresholds, so confirm the current figure in the product itself. On borrowing, loans are typically issued at 50% loan to value, meaning you post roughly twice the collateral you borrow, so a 500 USD loan needs around 1,000 USD of Bitcoin. If the collateral's value falls far enough that the loan reaches 80% of it, Ledn states liquidation is automatic and irreversible, meaning the Bitcoin is sold without further warning. The minimum loan is 500 USD.
On reserves, Ledn states that an independent public accountant attests to its assets and liabilities at a point in time, and that the procedure has been conducted every six months. That is a check of what the company reported on a particular date rather than a continuing guarantee. Interest is not offered in all jurisdictions.
YouHodler
YouHodler advertises up to 20% a year on its Yield account.
The condition is a loyalty level rather than a token. Per its own help centre, the yield limit, the rate for each currency and the number of assets that earn are all set by account loyalty level, and levels rise through using its MultiHODL product and making conversions rather than by holding anything specific. Both of those are trading activities with their own costs and risks, so the 20% is not simply waiting to be claimed. Its Yield page states there is no lock period and assets can be withdrawn at any time.
Two limits from its own material. Yield is not available to Swiss users, and its promotions and loyalty benefits are not offered to UK residents. The 90% loan to value figure that circulates widely comes from an older YouHodler blog post and is not confirmed in its current product documentation.
Binance
Binance is the deepest market here for active trading, which is the reason to use it. As a yield venue it is a different proposition.
Its US arm advertises staking rewards of up to 22.10%, a figure belonging to a single less widely held token, and its published fee schedule states a standard service fee of between 9.95% and 39.95% deducted from earned staking rewards, with 90% on Soft-Stake. Displayed estimated rates are stated to already reflect the fee, which is better disclosure than most, though the width of that fee range means the asset you choose matters a great deal.
Regulatory scrutiny across several markets remains a live consideration, and the US product set is narrower than the global one.
OKX
OKX pairs a large exchange, including contracts aimed at active traders, with its Simple Earn yield product.
Its live Earn page showed a top rate of 18.81% estimated APY on Cosmos in the flexible product, against 3.41% on USDC, 2.08% on ETH and 0.43% on BTC. Flexible subscriptions can be redeemed at any time. Fixed term subscriptions cannot be redeemed for the duration of the term once matched.
The fee is the thing to know. OKX's own documentation states it charges 15% of accrued returns on flexible Simple Earn and distributes the remaining 85%, and that this does not apply to the fixed term version.
Coinbase
Coinbase suits users who want a large US listed company and a simple interface.
Its published USDC reward rate is 3.50% with a paid membership. It confirms it charges no fee to stake or unstake, but takes a commission from network staking rewards before paying them out, with the schedule varying by asset. The rate is lower than most of this list.
One note on language, because it gets used loosely across this sector. Being a listed company subject to securities regulation is not the same as the specific yield product being regulated or protected, and that distinction applies to every platform here including EarnPark.
Verdict on the best CeFi platforms in 2026
There is no single winner here, because the platforms are genuinely built for different things.
If you want a published rate on Bitcoin, Ethereum or stablecoins that does not require buying a platform token to qualify, and you are willing to read the risk level and withdrawal terms of the specific strategy you pick, EarnPark is the case this comparison sets out. The app shows both before you deposit, and the yield calculator will model it against your own balance.
If you want several products in one account and do not mind holding a platform token to improve your rate, Nexo covers the most ground.
If you want stablecoin yield alongside published reserve attestations on a regular schedule, Ledn, provided you understand it is no longer a Bitcoin yield venue.
If you want the highest advertised rate on deposited assets with no stated lock period, YouHodler, subject to reaching the loyalty level and to the regional exclusions in its own terms.
If you mainly trade, Binance for depth and OKX for contracts alongside earn, with OKX's 15% cut of flexible returns priced in. If you want a large listed company and a simple interface at a lower rate, Coinbase.
How to choose
Start with the asset you actually hold rather than the headline, because a platform's best rate often belongs to a token you have no interest in, as the OKX figures show.
Then find the condition attached to that rate. It will usually be a token holding, a loyalty tier, a fixed term, a particular asset, or a fee taken from rewards.
Then check how you get out. Ask whether the product pays rewards on demand, after a waiting period, or on a monthly cycle, and separately when you can actually withdraw the deposit itself. Those two are not the same thing and are easy to confuse.
Then read the reserve reporting for what it covers. An attestation confirms what a company reported on a stated date, and whether it covers liabilities as well as assets varies, so check which. An audit is bounded by whatever was submitted for audit. Our piece on risk categorisation covers why risk labels across this market are hard to compare.
Finally, treat an unexplained source of return as one material risk factor among several, alongside the legal entity you are contracting with, the custody arrangement, and what happens to your claim if the company fails.
The risks worth understanding first
Custody risk is what ended Celsius, BlockFi and Voyager. On most CeFi platforms your claim is a contractual one against the company rather than ownership of specific coins, which in plain terms means that if the company fails you generally join the queue of creditors rather than simply retrieving your own assets. Exact treatment depends on the entity, the terms and the jurisdiction. There is no deposit insurance equivalent in this market.
Strategy risk is a separate thing that often gets conflated with it. An investment strategy losing money despite disclosed risk and a company being unable to operate or honour withdrawals are different events, and they deserve different reactions.
Rate risk is the mundane one. Every figure in this article is variable, several are tiered, and two platforms here have changed or withdrawn products within the past eighteen months.
When CeFi makes more sense than DeFi
CeFi makes sense when you would rather not manage trades, blockchain transactions or strategy settings yourself, when you need to move money between a bank account and crypto, and when having a company accountable for an error is worth more to you than holding your own keys.
DeFi makes sense when counterparty risk is the thing you most want to avoid and you are comfortable carrying the risk of a flaw in the code instead. Our comparison of custodial and non custodial wallets sets out the practical tradeoff.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best CeFi platform in 2026? There is no single answer, because they differ most in what their headline rate requires. For a rate on deposited assets without holding a platform token, EarnPark is the case made above. For product breadth, Nexo. For stablecoin yield with regular reserve attestations, Ledn. For trading, Binance.
Are CeFi platforms safe in 2026? Reserve reporting and audits are more common than they were and are genuinely useful, though each covers a defined scope and a specific date. Your assets are still held by a company and your claim is usually contractual, so custody arrangements and the legal entity matter more than a percentage point of yield.
What is the difference between CeFi and DeFi? A CeFi platform holds your assets and runs the strategy for you. DeFi lets you interact with blockchain programs directly while keeping your own keys. The first carries counterparty risk, the second carries the risk of a flaw in the code, and neither is free of risk.
Can I still earn Bitcoin yield on Ledn? No. Ledn's own help centre records the closure of its BTC and ETH Growth Accounts, with the final interest payment on 1 July 2025, and states Growth Accounts are now available only for USDC and USDT. Ledn still offers Bitcoin backed loans.
Why are some rates so much higher than others? Usually because the rate belongs to a less widely held token, requires a lock or a loyalty tier, comes from a higher risk strategy, or has a fee taken out of the rewards before you see them. The table above lists which applies to each platform.
What happened to the CeFi platforms that collapsed in 2022? Celsius, BlockFi and Voyager failed within months of each other, in each case involving leverage and lending practices that depositors could not see. The lasting effect is that reserve attestations and clearer risk disclosure became an expectation rather than a selling point.
Start earning
To see what any of this means for your own balance, the EarnPark app shows the current rate for each asset and strategy alongside its risk level and withdrawal terms before you deposit anything. Worth reading first is the public record of incidents and what changed afterwards, which tells you more about a platform than any comparison table.
Sources used
Competitor figures were read in September 2026 from each platform's own published pages. Because house policy is not to link to competitor sites, the specific document is named instead so the claim can be checked.
- Binance.US staking page and published fee schedule, checked September 2026
- YouHodler Yield account guide and loyalty programme help articles, and its Yield product page, checked September 2026
- OKX Earn page, Simple Earn flexible introduction and Simple Earn user agreement, checked September 2026
- Nexo earn page and loyalty programme support article, checked September 2026
- Ledn savings and USDC Growth Account pages, Growth Account rate and sunsetting help articles, Bitcoin backed loans page and proof of reserves page, checked September 2026
- Coinbase earn page and staking rewards help article, checked September 2026
- EarnPark asset pages, PARK staking guide and help centre fee documentation, all linked above, verified 20 September 2026
- DefiLlama for open market yield benchmarks

