Bithumb's $40 Billion "Oops": The Typo That's Rewriting Crypto Law Worldwide
One employee typed "BTC" instead of "won." 695 users woke up as instant millionaires. Bitcoin crashed 17%. Now Korea is overhauling crypto law—and every exchange on Earth is on notice.
It started as a routine promotion. On February 6, 2026, South Korea's second-largest cryptocurrency exchange Bithumb launched a "random box" campaign promising lucky users cash rewards of 2,000 to 50,000 Korean won (roughly $1.40 to $34). Simple. Routine. Boring.
Then someone made a typo.
An employee processing the payouts entered "BTC" instead of "won" as the currency unit. In an instant, 695 users didn't receive $1.40 each—they received 2,000 Bitcoin each. At current prices, that's over $130 million per person. The total? Approximately 620,000 BTC worth $40-44 billion—more than Bithumb, or indeed most exchanges, actually hold.
💀 The Most Expensive Typo in Financial History
Total: ~$1,000
Total: ~$40 BILLION
What followed was 35 minutes of pure chaos. Some users, seeing astronomical Bitcoin balances in their accounts, immediately started selling. Bitcoin's price on Bithumb crashed 17% in minutes—from ~104 million won to 81.1 million won—as panic selling triggered a flash crash. By the time Bithumb froze trading and withdrawals for affected accounts, 86 users had already sold 1,788 BTC worth approximately $130 million.
The 35 Minutes That Shook Korean Crypto
The question everyone was asking: How does an exchange accidentally distribute $40 billion in Bitcoin it doesn't even have?
The answer reveals a troubling reality about crypto exchange infrastructure. According to South Korea's Financial Services Commission, Bithumb's internal system allowed employees to issue rewards in Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Korean won without formal settlement procedures or multi-layer verification. There was apparently no automated check to flag that the total payout exceeded the exchange's entire Bitcoin reserves.
"The fact that a single error in setting an event reward unit can destabilize an entire crypto exchange demonstrates the current state of our systems." — Hwang Seung-wook, Bithumb Exchange Business Division Vice President (internal email)
The "Ghost Bitcoin" Problem
Here's where it gets even stranger. Bithumb credited users with 620,000 BTC—approximately $40 billion worth—but no actual on-chain transfer of that magnitude occurred. The Bitcoin existed only as database entries on Bithumb's internal ledger, not as real blockchain transactions.
This raises fundamental questions about how centralized exchanges operate. When you "hold" Bitcoin on an exchange, you're really just holding a number in their database. The exchange promises that number represents real Bitcoin somewhere in their reserves. But as Bloomberg reported, regulators are now investigating how Bithumb could initiate an exchange of $40 billion in Bitcoin "that it apparently didn't have."
The Damage Report
Total "Ghost BTC" Distributed: 620,000 BTC (~$40-44 billion)
BTC Successfully Recovered: 618,212 BTC (99.7%)
BTC Sold Before Freeze: 1,788 BTC by 86 users (~$130 million)
BTC Still Unrecovered: ~$9-13 million worth
Estimated User Losses from Panic Selling: ~₩1 billion ($760,000)
BTC Price Drop During Incident: 17% (104M → 81.1M won)
"This Shows Structural Problems": Korea's Regulatory Hammer Falls
The response from South Korean regulators was swift and unequivocal. On February 9, 2026, Financial Supervisory Service Governor Lee Chan-jin held an emergency press briefing that sent shockwaves through the crypto industry.
"The problem lies in the system allowing erroneous entries. This will require serious consideration during the second phase of the legislative process. The incident shows the structural problems of electronic systems for virtual assets." — Lee Chan-jin, Governor, Financial Supervisory Service (FSS)
The FSS immediately announced:
- On-site inspections of Bithumb already underway
- Industry-wide audits of internal control systems at all crypto exchanges
- Emergency task force formed to accelerate the Digital Asset Basic Act phase 2
- AI-powered surveillance systems to be deployed for real-time market monitoring
- Stricter licensing requirements for exchanges and stablecoin issuers
Lee made clear that if the inspection uncovers legal breaches, the FSS will "promptly escalate the review to a formal investigation and impose strict measures." He also warned that unresolved weaknesses in internal controls could translate into licensing risks for exchanges—meaning Bithumb could theoretically lose its ability to operate.
The New Rules Coming to Korean Crypto
The Bithumb incident has become the catalyst for the most aggressive crypto regulatory push in Korean history. Here's what's being prepared:
Digital Asset Basic Act (Phase 2)
Comprehensive legislation covering token issuance disclosures, exchange listings, and standardized licensing for crypto operators and stablecoin creators.
AI Market Surveillance
Real-time monitoring using artificial intelligence to detect price manipulation, whale activity, and suspicious trading patterns. The FSS is upgrading its VISTA platform with text-analysis tools.
Bank-Level Internal Controls
Exchanges may be required to adopt internal control standards comparable to traditional financial institutions, including multi-layer transaction verification.
Unregistered App Blocks
Since January 28, 2026, Android users in Korea can be blocked from downloading apps from unregistered overseas exchanges. This policy is pushing trading to domestic platforms.
The Virtual Asset User Protection Act, passed in 2024 following the Terra-Luna collapse, already tightened rules. But regulators now view that as insufficient. The new framework aims to close loopholes that allowed "operational failures" like Bithumb's to occur in the first place.
The Legal Quagmire: Can Users Keep the "Free" Bitcoin?
Perhaps the most fascinating aspect of this saga is the legal battle brewing over the ~$9-13 million in Bitcoin that remains unrecovered. Some users who received the mistaken payouts have refused to return the funds, raising a thorny legal question: Is keeping accidentally received cryptocurrency illegal?
The 2021 Supreme Court Wrinkle
In a 2021 ruling, South Korea's Supreme Court declared that cryptocurrency does not qualify as "legal property" under Korean law. This creates ambiguity around whether mistaken crypto transfers can be treated the same as mistaken bank transfers, which are clearly recoverable under "unjust enrichment" laws.
Bithumb is reportedly reaching out to users individually, "seeking to secure repayment through voluntary cooperation on a case-by-case basis." Civil lawsuits are considered likely.
Market participants note that since the promotional terms clearly stated rewards of 2,000-50,000 won, recipients of 2,000 BTC "could reasonably have been aware that the funds were not rightfully theirs." This may support Bithumb's civil case—but crypto's murky legal status means nothing is guaranteed.
Bithumb's Response: Compensation and Contrition
Bithumb has moved quickly to contain the damage, announcing:
| Measure | Details |
|---|---|
| Panic Selling Compensation | Users who sold BTC at unfavorable prices receive full sale amount + 10% bonus |
| Apology Payment | 20,000 won (~$14) to all users active during incident |
| Trading Fee Waivers | Affected customers exempt from trading fees for unspecified period |
| Crisis Management System | "Company-wide" overhaul of asset protection and transaction stability |
| Enhanced Verification | AI tools to flag unusual transaction patterns before execution |
CEO Lee Jae-won committed to "prioritizing customer trust over external growth"—a tacit admission that Bithumb's aggressive expansion may have outpaced its operational safeguards.
Global Ripple Effects: Why This Matters Beyond Korea
The World Is Watching
South Korea is one of the world's most active crypto markets, with exceptionally high retail participation. What happens here often influences regulatory thinking elsewhere. The Bithumb incident is already being cited in global debates about:
- Proof of Reserves: If Bithumb could credit $40B in "ghost Bitcoin," what does that say about exchange reserve claims globally?
- Operational Risk: Regulators worldwide are reconsidering whether crypto exchanges should face the same operational controls as banks.
- Instant Settlement: The 35-minute window between error and freeze highlights how fast crypto mistakes can compound.
- AI Surveillance: Korea's plan to deploy AI monitoring may become a template for other jurisdictions.
Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy, commented on social media that "trust is the bedrock of digital assets—exchanges must prioritize proof of reserves." The incident reinforces arguments by Bitcoin advocates for self-custody over exchange custody.
FAQ: The Bithumb $40 Billion Bitcoin Mistake
The Bottom Line
Bithumb's $40 billion typo will likely be remembered as a watershed moment for crypto regulation—not because of the amount involved, but because of what it revealed. A single employee, with a single keystroke, exposed that one of Asia's largest exchanges lacked basic safeguards that would be standard at any traditional bank.
The 99.7% recovery rate is remarkable. The response from Korean regulators is unprecedented. The questions raised about exchange infrastructure are uncomfortable but necessary.
For crypto holders, the lesson is brutally simple: When your Bitcoin is on an exchange, it's just a number in someone else's database. Whether that number is accurate—or whether it could be accidentally multiplied by a million—depends entirely on the operational controls you'll never see.
Korea is now writing the rules that will define how exchanges operate. The world is taking notes. And somewhere in Seoul, 695 people are presumably still processing the 35 minutes when they were, briefly, some of the richest humans on Earth.
Secure Your Crypto Yields the Right Way
Worried about exchange risk? EarnPark offers regulated, transparent yield optimization across CeDeFi strategies—with verified reserves and institutional-grade security.
Explore Secure Yield Options →